INTRODUCTION
When we think of justice in india, the image that comes to mind is usually that of courts, —crowded, traditional, and often slow-moving. But did you know there's another powerful arm of the legal system working in the background?
Welcome to the world of tribunals —specialized bodies that handles specific disputes swiftly and effectively. Let's explore how they're rooted in the Indian Constitution, why they exist, and how they function. In a country as vast and diverse as india, the need for a fast, efficient, and specialized system of justice is crucial. While traditional courts form the backbone of our judiciary, they often face heavy workloads and procedural delays. To address this, the Indian legal system has incorporate tribunals— specialized quasi-judicial bodies designed to resolve specific types of disputes outside the conventional court framework. Tribunals aim to deliver speedy, experts, and cost-effective justice in areas such as taxation, administrative service matters, environmental protection and corporate law. Recognized formally in the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment, these bodies play a vital role in reducing the burden on regular courts while ensuring focused and specialized adjudication. Tribunals got formal recognition in the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1976, which added:
Article 323-A
A empowers Parliament to establish Administrative Tribunals for adjudication of disputes and complaints related to the recruitment and conditions of service of public servants. It allows:
• The establishment of a Central Administrative Tribunals
(CAT) for central government employees.
• Creation of State Administrative Tribunals (SATs) for state employees.
• Exclusion of jurisdiction of courts ( except Supreme Court under Article 136).
Key Highlights
The tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) but must follow natural justice. Parliament can decide the structure, powers, and procedures of such tribunals.
Tribunals under Article 323-A are created through parliamentary legislation.
Article 323-B
It empowers both Parliament and State Legislatures to establish tribunals for other matters, including:
• Taxation
• Industrial and Labour disputes
• Land reforms
• Ceiling on urban property
• Election to Parliament and State Legislatures
• Food and civil supplies
• Rent and tenancy rights
Unlike Article 323-A, which is exclusive to administrative matters, Article 323-B covers a wider range of subject areas.
Types of Tribunals in india
1. Central Administrative Tribunals (CAT)
The Central Administrative Tribunals (CAT) was established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, in line with Article 323-A of the Indian Constitution. It functions as a quasi-judicial body that deals with service-related disputes and complaints of Central Government employees.
*Key points:
• Established - 1985.
• Constitutional Basis - Article 323-A.
• Statutory Basis - Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
• Jurisdiction - Service matters of Central Government
employees.
• Excludes - Armed forces, High Court/ Supreme Court
staff.
*Structure:
• Chairman ( retired High Court judge or equivalent)
• Judicial Members ( legal background)
• Administrative Members (senior civil servants)
• Principle Bench : New Delhi
• Other Benches: Across major cities with circuit benches
as needed
* Power and Functions:
• Adjudicates recruitment, promotion, transfer, pay,
pension, disciplinary matters, etc.
• Has powers of a civil court under the Civil Procedure
Code.
• Provides speedy and expert resolution to service
disputes.
2. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is a quasi-judicial body that hears appeals against orders passed by the Income Tax Department. It's the second appellate authority under direct tax laws in India and functions as an independent forum for fair tax dispute resolution.
* Key facts
• Established - 25th January, 1941.
• Under - Income Tax Act, 1961.
• Ministry - Ministry of Law and Justice ( Not finance - to
maintain independence).
• Headquarters - Mumbai.
• Motto - " Nishpaksh Sulabh Satvar Nyaya" ( Impartial,
Easy & Speedy Justice).
*Structure
Benches :
• Over 60 benches in cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata,
Chennai, Bengaluru, etc.
• Can be Single Member Benches ( for small cases) or
Division Benches ( two members: one Judicial + one
Accountant)
Members:
• Judicial Members: Must be qualified judges or legal
experts.
• Accountant Members: Must be chartered accountants or
tax officers.
3. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
The National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT) is a quasi-judicial body that adjudicates disputes and issues related to company law and insolvency proceedings in india.
*Legal Foundation
• Established - Companies Act, 2013.
• Came into effect - 1st June 2016.
• Set up based on recommendation of - Justice Eradi
Committee.
• Also function under - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ( IBC), 2016.
*Structure
• Principal Bench - Located in New Delhi, headed by the
President.
• Other Benches - Spread across major cities in India
(Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad, etc).
• Composition of Benches:
•Judicial Member - must be a retired judge or legal
experts.
•Technical Member - must be an expert in corporate law,
accountancy, or company affairs.
4. National Green Tribunal ( NGT)
The National Green Tribunal (NGT) is a specialized judicial body set up for the effective and expenditious disposal of environmental cases. It deals with matters relating to environmental protection, conservation of forests, and natural resources, and enforcement of legal rights related to the environment.
*Legal Foundation
• Established - National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
• Came into force - 18th October 2010.
• Based on - Article 21 of the constitution ( Right to life includes right to a healthy environment).
*Structure
• Principal Bench - New Delhi.
• Zonal Benches - Bhopal, Pune, Kolkata, Chennai.
• Circuit Benches - Operate temporarily in other cities.
• Members:
• Chairperson - A retired Supreme Court judge or Chief
Justice of a High Court.
• Judicial Members - Retired judges of High Courts.
• Expert Members - Environmental scientists, specialists
in forest/agriculture, pollution control, etc.
* Power and Procedure
• Not bound by Civil Procedure Code (CPC) -
• Can provide compensation, relief and restitution.
• Can hear appeals against orders passed by authorities
under environmental laws.
• Binding decisions - treated like civil court orders.
Why do we need tribunal?
• Speedy justice
Tribunals are faster than regular courts.
• Expertise
They include specialists in the field ( like tax or
environment), so decisions are more informed.
• Reduced Burden
Hight Courts and the Supreme Court can focus on core constitutional matters.
• Cost-Effective
Simple procedures= Lower litigation costs.
Criticism and Challenges
Despite their advantages, tribunals have faced criticism and legal challenges:
1. Lack of Judicial independence
Executive involvement in appointments raises.
questions about the neutrality of tribunals.
2. Accessibility Issues
Many tribunals are located in metro cities, limiting
access for rural population.
3. Inadequate Infrastructure
Shortage of staff and physical infrastructure in
many tribunals hinders their effective functioning.
4. Ambiguity in Jurisdictions
Overlap of jurisdiction with regular courts leads to
confusion and forum shopping.
5. Delay in Appointments
Vacancies in tribunals delay justice and defeat the
purpose of their establishment.
Landmark judgements on Tribunals
1. S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India (1987)
The Supreme Court held that tribunals under Article
323-A are a substitute for High Courts, and therefore
must possess the same independence and
effectiveness. This case laid the foundation for
safeguarding the independence of tribunals.
2. L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997)
A historic decision where the Supreme Court ruled
that:
•The power of judicial review of Hight Courts and
the Supreme Court under Articles 226/227 and 32
cannot be taken away.
•Tribunals are supplementary, not substitutes for
High Courts.
•Appeals from tribunals decisions must lie before
High Courts to maintain constitutional balance.
•This judgement reasserted the supremacy of
constitutional courts over statutory tribunals.
Conclusion
Tribunals are a crucial part of India's justice system. By blending legal authority with subject-specific expertise, they offer a focused and efficient path to justice. Tribunals play a vital role in India's justice delivery system by offering an alternative to traditional court proceedings. With their focus on speed, specialization, and efficiency, they help reduce the burden on regular courts while providing expert adjudication in complex areas like taxation, corporate law, and public service. Although they face challenges related to independence and procedural clarity, tribunals continue to evolve as an essential part of the legal framework. Strengthening their structure and ensuring transperancy will be key to enhancing access to justice and upholding the rule of law in a modern constitutional democracy like india. They complement the judiciary by providing expert adjudication, speedier trails, and reduced litigation costs. However, to uphold the constitutional ideals of fairness, independence and justice, it is crucial to ensure that tribunals function independently, are accessible, and deliver quality decisions. With thoughtful reforms and strong institutional framework, tribunals can serve as an effective pillar of administrative justice in India's democratic setup.
0 Comments